Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

blueSGL t1_iwerajz wrote

>So, what we'll see is redundant humans with no purpose

this has been covered repeatedly on here, If a % of the work force each year gets replaced by AI (either by augmenting so supply outstrips demand or flat out replacing) UBI or a similar scheme will be forced to be enacted by every government to prevent the economy collapsing and wide scale riots.
There is no reason to produce products and run services via automation if there is no longer a large enough consumer base to buy them so entire business sectors will lobby for UBI

0

Emory_C t1_iwfk4aj wrote

There is zero evidence that anything like “UBI” For the entire population will work, or will lead to anything other than people living at a subsistence level.

1

blueSGL t1_iwfp1u3 wrote

again, it would have to work, the current economic system is designed around a certain percentage of the population being able to afford goods and services. Start removing a chunk of that each year and there won't be any choice, there is not suddenly going to be more jobs to hoover those people up.

Having a lot of intelligent former workers unable to pay bills and willing to fight for a common cause is a dangerous mix, anyone who is a student of history can tell you how quickly such a thing can go bad and governments (esp ones that likely have much better AI modeling) will decide to pay people a basic income than deal with the alternative.

There will be pressure to do this both from the newly unemployed and the companies with shrinking bottom lines. Whatever solution is conceived would need to satisfies both. That may be UBI or a similar scheme. A correction of this sort would be the only option to avoid major disruption to the capitalist system. Something that would be inevitable without intervention.

0

Emory_C t1_iwfua4b wrote

Again, UBI will only support people at a subsistence level. What you're suggesting is basically servitude to the state.

1