I find it infinitely challenging to know how to talk about this subject online. Anyone else here feel the same way?

I wish them the best developing the bill, nuances and all. Trying to understand what the university analyses say on the societal effects of pornographic deepfakes, to be blunt, their conclusions are largely not positive. Given the track record of these scientific institutions (depending on the university of course but generally speaking, highly regarded like Rutgers & one analysis they have), it is one reason why I wrote my flair... How often have we come across perspectives online that push solely for adaptation, not regulation, in such tech circles? I don't mean to insult those who have that perspective, but given what most university analyses are giving on the issue, calling for some regulation, it seems only right. Sure I'd love a world where erotic/pornographic content can exist more freely, especially since I'm an ultra filthy cybernetically-modify-my-body-to-have-ten-penises-and-ten-vaginas-before-entering-the-next-stage-of-the-singularity pervert. It's just... how do we build such opportunity for all, rather than only empowering the already powerful like what the Rutgers analysis talks about?