Submitted by Rumianti6 t3_z6dd0j in singularity
spazzadourx t1_iy3b4k4 wrote
You are in denial if you believe AI image generation is just a tool. A five year old could use it and come up with professional quality images. AI is a replacement.
And art was considered an unstable career path before AI as well. Theres very little barrier to entry and a lot of hobbyists are as good as professionals. It's not like Dalle flipped its perception or anything. There is absolutely no way it'll be replaced last. I don't think it's been seen as a viable career path for everyone since the 1800s.
polygon_lover t1_iy3oac3 wrote
'My 5 year old could have painted that'.
Yeah but they didn't.
Art is about emotion. Text prompted AI generated images are the opposite of that.
A 5 year old could type in 'Beautiful oil painting style, girl with a pearl earring, high resolution.' , but who gives a shit?
What emotion and intention does that convey? Nobody looks at an AI image and feels the artist's joy or pain. It's completely superficial.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments