Submitted by OldWorldRevival t3_zo9v5x in singularity
AndromedaAnimated t1_j0mrsup wrote
Reply to comment by OldWorldRevival in Why are people so opposed to caution and ethics when it comes to AI? by OldWorldRevival
So it’s basically a tool that can be misused. Previously, humans have been this tool.
Have you never seen artworks being copied and sold illegally? Every dollar store and flea market has „stolen art“, and you used to be able to even order large physical copies of artwork through the internet (a friend of mine did, that’s how I know, and no, I wouldn’t do that - I am a pretty skilled hobby artist, I‘d copy my Van Gogh myself).
Maybe the problem here is the prompts being used? If a human orders an AI to draw „trending on ArtStation“, it’s the human stealing, not the AI. So it would be very easy to prove you are not guilty, eh?
And it’s even possible to use your own pictures…
Is it the knife that’s evil, or the hand that stabs?
OldWorldRevival OP t1_j0msidz wrote
AI art is not evil, innately.
The scraping of people's copyrighted, supposedly protected works and then using that work as tooling for your engineered system? That is evil, and it is a human decision that is the evil.
AndromedaAnimated t1_j0mv7h3 wrote
Sorry cannot answer more. Your comment about dogs and calculus shows me that you are not safe for discussion 🤪
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments