Submitted by OldWorldRevival t3_zo9v5x in singularity
QuietOil9491 t1_j0pnecj wrote
Reply to comment by Wassux in Why are people so opposed to caution and ethics when it comes to AI? by OldWorldRevival
Dude, this take is dishonest as fuck.
- AI isn’t a person
- AI doesn’t “learn” like a person does
- Human people are imbued with rights by function of existing, AI doesn’t have human rights
- AI image models are “trained” by inputting libraries of copyrighted images, without consent of the artists whose work is being used to allow those AI to function
You know full well AI isn’t sentient, nor acting on its own, so it’s not in any way shape or form “learning like a person does”
It’s a fucking computer, run by corporations, for profit, using the work of others without consent
Wassux t1_j0qv84t wrote
Please stop the strawman bs. I never said AI is sentient. Nor did I say it is acting on it's own. It does learn exactly like a human does. The structure is exactly the same as brain structure. Source: I'm an AI engineer (or at least will be in a couple of months, finishing my master)
Human brain works by making connections between synapses, these connections are then given a weight. (Works with amperage of electrical signals in the brain). An AI has nodes that are given weights in math. So you get matrix multiplication, exactly like the human brain. Except way less efficient. Although we're working on edge AI chips that either have memory integrated in the processor or analog chips to completely copy the human brain.
And the method of learning is also very similar to humans. So imagine it as an AI learning from other humans. Just like humans learn from other humans.
You may not like it, but that's how it works.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments