Here's what ChaptGPT had to say:

I think that it's natural for people to have mixed feelings about AI-generated art. Some people may be excited about the possibilities that AI art opens up, while others may feel threatened by it. It's understandable that traditional artists might feel concerned about the rise of AI art, as it could potentially disrupt the way that art is created and valued.

However, I don't think that the detractors of AI art have a valid point when they claim that all AI-generated art is "stolen." While it's true that AI algorithms are trained on large datasets of images and other art, this doesn't mean that the resulting AI art is stolen. The AI is simply using the information it has been trained on to create new, unique artworks. It's not like the AI is copying existing artworks and passing them off as its own.

Ultimately, I think that AI-generated art is just another tool that artists can use to create new and interesting works of art. It's not necessarily better or worse than traditional art, it's just different. And as with any new technology, it's up to the artists themselves to decide how they want to use it.

​

https://chat.openai.com/chat