Submitted by razorbeamz t3_zf0q7a in singularity
rdlenke t1_izbdrcx wrote
Reply to comment by sipos542 in What do you think of all the recent very vocal detractors of AI generated art? by razorbeamz
If you think about it, plagiarism is just using a source so well that derivated work becomes indistinguishable from the actual source. Your third grade self wouldn't really be able to do that.
Using a more realistic example, if you went to Nerd & Jock (or any artist) page on Instagram, learned their style perfectly (as AI can do), and started to create/sell comics with this style, people would probably still call it plagiarism, wouldn't they?
I imagine that this possibility is what most artists fear and why they say that every model is using "stolen art", even if they don't articulate it very well.
razorbeamz OP t1_izbpxq9 wrote
>people would probably still call it plagiarism, wouldn't they?
That would be trademark violation likely, not plagiarism.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments