Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

GuyWithLag t1_ize6696 wrote

>4.0 GPA stem club member robotics club member internship at a biology lab

But your thinking _as expressed by the post you wrote_ is of a teenager; you writing is sub-par and somewhat rambling. Have you actually integrated and internalized anything of what you were taught in that year, besides by osmosis from GPT-3? And no, I'm not talking about bloody facts, mate.

You probably should pass this piece through a GPT-3-equivalent cleanup process. But here lies the rub: you will need to do this for everything that you do going forward, and the facade will need to never fall.

11

visarga t1_izg14yr wrote

> But here lies the rub: you will need to do this for everything that you do going forward, and the facade will need to never fall.

In a few years we'll be all surrounded by very advanced AI left and right. The trend is to use more and more AI, not less. It will become like penmanship in the age of keyboards. Everyone will use AI for writing.

BTW, you can use GPT-3 prompted with personality profiles to answer polls, rate things, act like a focus group. If you know the distribution of your audience you can focus-group the shit out of your messages to obtain the maximum impact.

> “conditioning GPT3 on thousands of socio-demographic backstories from real human participants in multiple large surveys in the United States: the 2012, 2016, and 2020 waves of the American National Election Studies (ANES)[16], and Rothschild et al.’s “Pigeonholing Partisans” data.

> When properly conditioned, is able to produce outputs biased both toward and against specific groups and perspectives in ways that strongly correspond with human response patterns along fine-grained demographic axes. In other words, these language models do not contain just one bias, but many”.

They can simulate a population in silicon for virtual polling. Everyone will want to virtual-test their tweets and articles.

6

GuyWithLag t1_izg8rz0 wrote

Was this written by an AI? because it's veering hard to a similar topic after the first paragraph.

>penmanship in the age of keyboards

Bad example, in both cases you need to know what you want to write, and how to express it. I'm of the position that the approach used by OP will lead to a shallower understanding of the topics he delegates to the AI for research, and that he himself will not have the necessary foundations to generate advances (novel things, sure, he'll get from the AI recombining the current state of the art).

2

paint-roller t1_izgco2a wrote

It's not well written and it's rambling...I honestly expected the op to say the post was written by ai at the end.

But as someone else wrote well probably have ai to clean up anything we write in the future. If there wasn't spell check and auto correct people would probably think I was an idiot....then again standardized spellings have only come about between the 1500s-1700s. So that's a pretty recent advancement.

1