Submitted by Foundation12a t3_zyau7z in singularity
Tip_Odde t1_j24ru9n wrote
I havent seen anyone
​
ANYONE
​
claim it was going to slow down next year lol
Artanthos t1_j254miw wrote
I am not expecting the research or breakthroughs to slow down.
I am expecting public releases to get snarled up in litigation.
Cult_of_Chad t1_j26b1lo wrote
Shit's real when the terrorism, for and against AI, starts. We all know it's coming.
Em0tionisdead t1_j27gdfd wrote
This. People who think the government is just going to let AI run rampant in society unrestricted are unbelievably naive.
Plus-Recording-8370 t1_j287ix8 wrote
Naive would be to think the government can do anything about it. Any obstacle put in ai's way will literally only make it stronger and undermine the petty human law givers even further. What we need is to find ways to adjust our societies to it, not the other way around.
Artanthos t1_j28g7qy wrote
The government can do as much as it has the will to accomplish.
The only questions are whether the government will choose to act and in what manner.
EscapeVelocity83 t1_j28zjgy wrote
You mean people. The government is an abstract entity created by people
Artanthos t1_j291nax wrote
I think we can all agree that congress is composed of discrete individuals who pass, or fail to pass, legislation.
Em0tionisdead t1_j29npuo wrote
Lol. We don't even have AI yet. The government has plenty of options still and are not going to willingly cede such power to common people.
Foundation12a OP t1_j24t7p5 wrote
Tip_Odde t1_j24te5i wrote
Based on the url I can see its a single message not a thread soooooooooooooooo
​
no one has claimed this. Should have just said "2023 is gonna be even bigger" or something and presented your view in a positive way instead of trying to negate others.
Foundation12a OP t1_j24txwp wrote
That is literally someone claiming that:
"Idk why, but I have a feeling AI will continue to progress, but not at the rate it did this year; the bar was set high in 2022."
All you said was you haven't see anyone claim it, well there is someone doing exactly that. Instead of reading the url, you maybe should have read the comment?
Tip_Odde t1_j24u813 wrote
Ah but then I would have seen one, an annoying outlier to my still true point. This way Im still right.
Mountain-Award7440 t1_j24v8nq wrote
I respect the honesty of being underhanded in a debate.
Tip_Odde t1_j24vuan wrote
Its a gamble, just banking on no one caring enough to screenshot it in this thread.
Foundation12a OP t1_j251lk7 wrote
based
TonyTalksBackPodcast t1_j278mn8 wrote
I have seen a lot of doubters who think the current iteration of ChatGPT is somehow the best it’ll get, but not anyone who thinks it’ll make an inverse exponential function
Good-AI t1_j299690 wrote
The tech won't slow down... Unless gov and lobbies interfere. Has happened a lot in the past unfortunately. Hopefully this wave is too big for them to.
Tip_Odde t1_j29cdxe wrote
The tech wont slow down, America will fall behind.
tatleoat t1_j25esvo wrote
Traditional artists are lobbying against image AIs with an interest in putting the genie back in the bottle
Tip_Odde t1_j25g1ot wrote
And nothing will come of it.
tatleoat t1_j25ix7x wrote
I hope not! They've already gotten Unstable Diffusion kicked off two fundraising sites based on anti AI rhetoric and I'd like that to be the end of their wins
Dorangos t1_j25zwl0 wrote
It's open source and will be untraceable. You can't put the genie back.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments