Submitted by PieMediocre872 t3_101l79k in singularity
Mortal-Region t1_j2plfw1 wrote
Reply to comment by PieMediocre872 in Simulating years into minutes in VR? by PieMediocre872
Yeah, but some people think the simulators will halt our simulation before we're able to make sub-simulations precisely to avoid that scenario (endlessly proliferating sub-simulations).
Chispy t1_j2pu0pd wrote
Why would they want to avoid that scenario though? Seems like the goal scenario to me.
Mortal-Region t1_j2pzajw wrote
My guess is that the goal of the simulation is to model Earth in the 20th & 21st centuries. So say they've got resources set aside for N such Earth simulations. They can run N simulations one after the other, halting each before sub-simulations become possible, or they can allow an N-deep stack of simulations to form. The problem with the second option is that the simulations will become less-and-less accurate representations of the 20th/21st century as you go down the stack. Copies of copies of copies. Also, you'll need to allocate memory for all N simulations to run at once, whereas with the first option you only need memory for 1 simulation at a time.
On the other hand, I'm sure they/we will run many different kinds of simulations, so the question really is: of the kinds that contain conscious people living in the 21st century, which is most common?
Kinexity t1_j2pu9zp wrote
Running a simulation inside a simulation would be like an OS running a VM. The amount of nesting could be almost infinite.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments