Submitted by CassidyHouse t3_10nsk59 in singularity
Frumpagumpus t1_j6j0vr4 wrote
Reply to comment by Steven81 in I’m ready by CassidyHouse
> If we live in a materialistic universe , I don't think that concepts like "importance" can even enter the conversation.
what, why does a soul or whatever have anything to do with importance? (my suspicion here would be you are trying to do something impossible to do with an axiomatic system)
> Yes the world will go on in some abstract way, but not in a manner that can -even in principle- matter to you
we just went over how "abstract" and "material" (the world) aren't necessarily so different... they are both spaces in a geometric sense mapped by coordinate systems
Steven81 t1_j6jvvdd wrote
> why does a soul or whatever have anything to do with importance?
It doesn't, I was reacting to something else entirely (namely a phrase of yours that I quoted).
> we just went over how "abstract" and "material" (the world) aren't necessarily so different...
A description of a thing (an "abstraction") is not the same as the thing in a materialistic universe. I can see how they can be neighbours in a platonic or more generally an idealistic universe.
Which is why it is crucial for us to know in what type of universe we find ourselves into.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments