Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

LittleTimmyTheFifth5 t1_j4exepw wrote

Eh, when A.I. can easily make TikTok length and style videos directly personalized to the user that keep the youngins entrained constantly, I doubt they would care that it wasn't made by a human.

24

graham_fyffe t1_j4f7q8y wrote

This is going to get stale real quick isn’t it? The AI is compelling right now because it taps into the Zeitgeist and we feel tickled by this. But if there are no more humans producing new content, or very few, then the Zeitgeist will essentially be frozen and it will only be reruns, reboots, and mashups from then on.

9

thegreenwookie t1_j4fs8kk wrote

>it will only be reruns, reboots, and mashups from then on.

This is mostly what the entertainment industry already is.

19

graham_fyffe t1_j4gfpzf wrote

Most entertainment is derivative, yes. But there’s still a tiny little bit of new creativity infused in these derivative works, except for the really bad ones. This all adds up and contributes to the Zeitgeist. And they also incorporate elements of the Zeitgeist that didn’t originate in the entertainment industry.

But this doesn’t invalidate my point. Without that small portion of truly creative new stuff being made, the whole thing will freeze. The more human artists we replace with AI, the fewer new ideas will be added to the culture each year.

5

[deleted] OP t1_j4g9gj4 wrote

> it will only be reruns, reboots, and mashups from then on.

So... TikTok

1

[deleted] OP t1_j4g9bmi wrote

Young people aren't just stupid mindless information traps.

People are driven by social context for such videos. Making it all AI makes it also similarly pointless.

2