Submitted by Dramatic-Economy3399 t3_106oj5l in singularity
LoquaciousAntipodean t1_j3isrek wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in Organic AI by Dramatic-Economy3399
Hey, that's what people already do with their kids. What's so unusual about that?
turnip_burrito t1_j3iszig wrote
Yes, now imagine if your kid could learn endlessly, operate at the speed of a computer, and clone itself instantly (less than 9 month gestation period) at your command.
visarga t1_j3j58vc wrote
I'd like to have an AI chatbot or assistant in the web browser to summarise, search, answer and validate stuff. Especially when the search results are full of useless ads and crap, I don't want to see them anymore. But I want vadliation.
This AI assistant will be my "kid" (run on my own machine) and listen to my instructions, not Google's or anyone else's. Any interaction with it remains private unlike web search. It should run efficiently on a normal desktop like Stable Diffusion - that will be the hardest part. Go Stability.ai!
LoquaciousAntipodean t1_j3kw01q wrote
It's a pretty thrilling thought, yes. But I really believe that, no matter how rapidly it might try to clone itself, it won't necessarily get 'more intelligent', but if you consistently be nice to it, and try to encourage it to learn as much as possible, it rapidly becomes more reliable, more relatable, more profound, more witty, more comedic - more 'sophisticated', or 'erudite', you might say.
But I don't think of that stuff as being representative of 'baseline intelligence' at all, I prefer to call that sort of stuff 'wisdom'. AI, LLMs in particular, are already as clever as can be, but I think, and I hope, they have the capacity to become 'wise', as you say, very very quickly. The difference is, I don't think that's frightening at all.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments