Submitted by DevilsRefugee t3_11djjvb in space
TiggerTheMad t1_jaa1nfk wrote
Reply to comment by aramil2001 in Who pays for space debris removal? by DevilsRefugee
What radiation? Are you thinking RTGs? I don't think they are typically used in things that are going to eventually de-orbit, it seems like a really bad idea. Unless you are orbiting some uranium enrichment plants, there isn't going to be radiation to remove.
Bombarded by cosmic rays != radioactive
aramil2001 t1_jaa3ct0 wrote
Well some quick googling shows I was incorrect they stopped sending RTGs in the 80s so the majority of the cost is getting crews up there. I’d think if it was satellite removal there’d be enough gold and valuable materials to make a profit
Pharisaeus t1_jac476e wrote
> I’d think if it was satellite removal there’d be enough gold and valuable materials to make a profit
What? No! Not even remotely close. There is no "gold" other then maybe tiny amount in eletronics. I'm not sure what you think satellites are made of, but it's essentially like trying to recover "materials" from your old car, old refrigerator, old PC or old mobile phone. Completely unprofitable even when you have those things readily available on the ground.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments