Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Flamingotough t1_j94i4kv wrote

Earth's surface rotates at about 1000mph, and to maintain geosynchronous orbit an object must orbit at about 7000mph - that why I said 'orbital' flight speed as opposed to surface speed.

1

cinemascifi t1_j95g4bd wrote

I didnt say anything about speed. Are you responding to the right comment? It seems like a non sequitur.

1

Flamingotough t1_j98ap4d wrote

I may have just misunderstood you point?

I thought you critized my idea of taking speed into account, by saying that objects in geosynchronous orbit would be stationary as seen from the ground. I just wanted to note that although that is true enough for this argument, such an object would still travel it's orbit at a significantly different velocity compared to the spot on the ground underneath.

1