Submitted by ChieftainMcLeland t3_11eqjsg in space
StarPeopleSociety t1_jagy55o wrote
Yeah 100 big satellites would be a lot cleaner than 10,000 small ones
Kind of cluttery don't ya think?
Adeldor t1_jahcnx2 wrote
Problem there is 100 big satellites would have to be at much higher altitudes for global visibility, and that introduces significant latency. Further, at higher altitudes, there's no natural meaningful decay of the orbits in the event of satellite failure.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments