Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

CurtisLeow t1_jdjme0n wrote

They did, but most of those subsidies have gone to ULA, Lockheed Martin, and Boeing. They didn’t go to the market leader, which is SpaceX. That was Cedric O’s point, that the money needs to be spent more efficiently.

5

VicenteOlisipo t1_jdjmrro wrote

Hm, yes they (also) did. Both directly and through subsidising or buying services from its clients. Some of which run by the same guy.

−1

sithelephant t1_jdkdt6g wrote

Buying a service from someone cheaper that you can source that service elsewhere is not actually a subsidy.

8

VicenteOlisipo t1_jdkl1ms wrote

Play whatever semantic games you want, loads of federal money went into developing the private tech instead of going to NASA or other federal tech funding. I'm not saying it was a bad bet, I'm saying is we can't just achieve the same results but adopting similar looking policies except without the money.

−1