Submitted by larsschellhas t3_124pxcz in space
EnigoMontoya t1_je11jm3 wrote
Reply to comment by larsschellhas in Is Space-Based Solar Power An Option to Solve Humanity's Energy Hunger After All? by larsschellhas
Right so the conversion is 50% but the transmission over distance is a distinct loss correct? Yes, microwaves can penetrate the atmosphere, but there is still a cost.
https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S2352484720317273-gr9.jpg
This diagram from a 2021 study touting a 45% conversion efficiency but notes a huge drop from the transmission... 400 KW -> 10 KW over just 10 KM.
When you consider geosynchronous orbit is all the way out at 35,000 KM. This seems like a major issue. What am I missing?
larsschellhas OP t1_je11s3v wrote
That there are only around 10-50 km of atmosphere is the way and that accuracy is the primary driver of losses. :)
larsschellhas OP t1_je1rz1o wrote
Or rather, according to EMROD, the main loss driver is the conversion to microwaves. Reconversion and transmission appear to be relatively efficient.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments