Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

KarmaWSYD t1_jeejsg0 wrote

Why would using whole satellite constellation be more practical for providing network access on the moon over some LTE stations?

3

tachophile t1_jefviph wrote

Because nothing needs to land, less delta V/fuel, and you'd need a lot fewer satellites than stations. Also, there should be little if any new h/w engineering necessary adapting Starlink for lunar operations.

0

KarmaWSYD t1_jefzn5j wrote

Starlink still needs ground stations for each connection, no? Besides, are we realistically even looking at that many stations?

1

tachophile t1_jeg7ic0 wrote

AFAIK not with the laser interconnect.

1

KarmaWSYD t1_jegmad3 wrote

That's at leastsomething. Still, you'd need user terminals which, to my knowledge, haven't gotten particularly small or light, at least compared to a 4G chip. Probably using quite a bit more energy, too.

1

tachophile t1_jegou4a wrote

Starlink v2 can and have started launching. They're planning to test it later this year with T-Mobile to create global data access via their existing phones.

1