Comments
Melodic-Way34 t1_jc0j87z wrote
There are dark sky reserves in Canada at least and it almost looks like this, it feels like you're falling off the face of the earth when you look up at the sky at 3am
ProjectDv2 t1_jc1pkna wrote
Yes, if you can get far enough away from urban areas, haze, and light pollution.
When I was younger I used to get away to extremely rural areas in the summer and lay in the middle of a back road on the warm asphalt, staring at the sky for hours. After my eyes adjusted, I could see the Milky Way and various gaseous formations. I haven't seen them in years now, it makes me really sad.
phosphenes t1_jc3qpdy wrote
No, it doesn't look much like this to the naked eye. Even in very dark sky areas, the Milky Way looks a lot fainter than this and the colors are basically invisible. Here's a photographer simulating what it would look like, and that matches my experience.
On the other hand, time lapse night sky photos never do a good job capturing just how many stars there are far from the cities. It's wild, and everyone needs to experience it.
kinsten66 t1_jc1cjrh wrote
I see this question a lot. Are you always asking them? Lol
But seriously, I have only ever really seen black with white dots of various groupings with the naked eye.
Then realized recently I have a stimitism, which makes looking at stars without glasses very gnarly.
Jazzlike-Outcome711 t1_jc6lgs0 wrote
Haha. First timer for me. I get as far out as possible from civilization and I have never seen any color like this. See lots of stars but no color. Might have to give this new phone a try.
[deleted] t1_jc0218n wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jc0hvpe wrote
[deleted]
typeOnegative77 t1_jc2v87j wrote
How is this possible? The light from the light house would have obliterated any light from the Milky Way? This is a composite for sure, but most probably from different places. Unless the photographer managed to switch off the lighthouse for an hour or so.
Cool nevertheless.
Kastranrob t1_jc30hfh wrote
I also thought the same, If anyone can explain, please?!
kouddo t1_jc39shk wrote
Ive taken images like this, and you either have to have the lighthouse turn on for a very short amount of time during the long exposure, or edit it in afterwards and make it a composite. With higher ISO and a really dark environment, you can get shots of the milky way like this in minutes.
nutstobutts t1_jc3q0nt wrote
The light houe is photographed earlier in the day when it's still a bit light out.
Then the sky is photographed with a motorized mount that moves across the sky (Which would make the lighthouse blurry).
Then photoshop does its magic.
[deleted] t1_jc39fda wrote
[removed]
songsofadistantsun t1_jc0tlng wrote
It's like a cannon pointing directly at the heart of the galaxy
escopaul t1_jc0x4d1 wrote
Is this the light house in Cabo Polonio, Uruguay? Im headed to Chile and Uruguay in 2 weeks and will be in Cabo Polonio soon!
Rabatis t1_jc1g80d wrote
Very nice. Do tell us about your experiences there!
bobngog t1_jc3boen wrote
I think it's the one in La Paloma but I'm not sure
escopaul t1_jc3c2sm wrote
I'll image search both of them, thank you! I shoot landscape astro so I've been thinking of ideas when I am there in a few weeks.
[deleted] t1_jc0nhl2 wrote
How did you get a picture of the Milky Way right next to a light house? Wouldn’t that be super duper light polluting?
LeicaM6guy t1_jc0uqw8 wrote
I’d guess stacked images. Might not even be shot in the same location.
Alternative_Gold_993 t1_jc0r2pr wrote
I'm sure the photo has been smoothed out in post, no way the exposure was this good at first.
CodeCocina t1_jc0s4cj wrote
Why do ppl call this the Milky Way ? I’ve read it’s a dwarf galaxy called Sagittarius that’s getting eating up by the Milky Way
danielravennest t1_jc22hwt wrote
It is from the Greek, meaning "milky circle". The galaxy is a flattened disk, and we are inside it. So from our viewpoint it looks like a circle around the sky. They didn't have telescopes, so all they could see is a faint white band.
This is an all-sky view with our galaxy oriented horizontally. Sagittarius is a dwarf galaxy mostly hidden by the center of ours. It is on the other side. It is the nearest galaxy to our own, at 50,000 light years, and orbits the Milky Way. The two blobs on the lower right are the Magellanic Clouds, the next nearest, and also orbit the Milky Way. They are about 3 times farther, and much larger than the Sagittarius dwarf. Both will end up merged with the Milky Way eventually.
[deleted] t1_jc23aid wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jc015nr wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jc04ewj wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jc08ztb wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jc0jn98 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jc0ywne wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jc1brx5 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jc4clo1 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jc4nvkq wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jc7b8zw wrote
[removed]
Jazzlike-Outcome711 t1_jbzzyda wrote
Can you see the Milky Way like this with the naked eye?