Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

fluffy_assassins t1_iu4sd5f wrote

Thanks for sharing the article. Do you think this effort will work in collaboration with the ISS, or be competition?

−1

-Baloo t1_iu53y8f wrote

Collaboration lol USA banned China from visiting the ISS.

>China is not a partner in the ISS and its astronauts have not been able to access the station. US rules prohibit NASA, a participating agency in the ISS, from engaging in bilateral partnerships with China.

They say the experiments will be made public and they're partners with other UN members.

23

fluffy_assassins t1_iu5fgfx wrote

I know about the sanctions, that's why I asked.

It sounds like the scientific community overall benefits from there being 2 and not just 1.

But at the same time... sanctions mean that China had to build their own, which could constitute competition.

See why I asked?

0

toodroot t1_iu6nigk wrote

u/-Baloo thought they were doing a good thing by educating you, but instead their time was wasted. Maybe you could be honest next time?

5

Evilchickennuggets t1_iu6zwdh wrote

What do you want them to be honest about?

2

toodroot t1_iu7vhva wrote

The congressional ban against collaborating with China, you know, the ban u/fluffy_assassins was pretending to be unaware of. And is grateful to have learned about, when they already knew about it.

5

fluffy_assassins t1_iu6sggv wrote

They were, their time was not wasted, I appreciate their answer.

−4