Mighty-Lobster t1_itb24io wrote
I am an astronomer, and I feel that this would not be a factor in my equation. I would pick the position that gives me the most resources to accomplish interesting science. My peers do not evaluate me based on whether I am a "leading figure" in an agency. They evaluate me on my scientific accomplishment. So I want a large research grant that gives me plenty of time on a computer cluster (if I was an observer I would be asking for telescope time) and a research team of clever and motivated postdocs to conduct amazing science.
WilliamLermer t1_itfdhy5 wrote
I also think workplace environment is important. Plenty of exploitative and toxic culture around in scientific fields, which is unhealthy in the long run, both on the individual level and in regards to projects.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments