Submitted by Koh-the-Face-Stealer t3_yi2qn0 in space
Comments
Adeldor t1_iuhmo48 wrote
SLS's prime contractor is Boeing, while this HLS's is SpaceX.
Spider_pig448 t1_iuhrm7b wrote
If only they had a great mind like yours to help them find the gas filler, then maybe we could have launched last month
ep_soe t1_iuhs1sa wrote
Instead of unnecessary attack on me, why don't you tell me what part of what I said was unrealistic or unfair given the objective history of the SLS and the Artemis Program so far.
Spider_pig448 t1_iuhuqyx wrote
SLS is a shitty ancient rocket but you're vastly oversimplifying the complexity of building a rocket and it's a pointlessly insulting comment. The failure to "put fuel in the SLS" is a failure of a test that validates the complex plumbing of a mobile building.
UngruntledAussie t1_iui7hsd wrote
Who is insulted? The rocket?
Torcal4 t1_iuii8sj wrote
“Well now I don’t wanna launch!”
[deleted] t1_iuik4am wrote
[removed]
EntranceThat7517 t1_iuikah3 wrote
Tell us how you really feel, what's really upsetting you?
Spider_pig448 t1_iuisr28 wrote
I just don't like seeing such negativity towards these large projects
MoaMem t1_iuiu7rt wrote
First day in the internets?
[deleted] t1_iuixj9b wrote
[removed]
ep_soe t1_iuh24yq wrote
Call me a pessimist, but given they can't even figure out how to successfully put fuel in the SLS for Artemis 1 I'm not holding my breath for a landing on Artemis 4....let alone a landing within this decade.