[removed]
Comments
[deleted] OP t1_iu0s8xe wrote
The Higgs field only imparts mass to a limited amount of particles and supposedly has a scaler field, no other Boson has zero spin and a scaler field...
Alarmed_Economics_90 t1_iu0tblf wrote
You wanna translate that down by a few years of college/research?
Like, for us "Physics without calc" students who had to drop even that.
LaunchTransient t1_iu0u6eq wrote
>Physics without calc
Tricky ask, calculus theory underlies so much physics that it is practically indispensable.
Even the simple English wiki reads like it's having a hard time properly explaining the concept of a Higgs field
Alarmed_Economics_90 t1_iu0uk31 wrote
No worries. I know enough for whatever Jeopardy questions there might be about the subject, and that's how I measure whether I've probed deeply enough
Edit: though there is that saying about how if you really understand something, you can explain it to a five year old...
LaunchTransient t1_iu0vzvf wrote
Oh I don't pretend to understand quantum theory or the full standard model. I'm down with general and special relativity, but quantum physics is just bizarre. Supposedly Feynman said "I think I can safely say that nobody really understands quantum mechanics".
I know enough to know when to tap out and let better intellects do the heavy lifting.
[deleted] OP t1_iu1fg3l wrote
[removed]
[deleted] OP t1_iu0wrp7 wrote
That was a canned understanding I gave, don't ask me what it really is...
Alarmed_Economics_90 t1_iu0x288 wrote
I don't think you can ask anyone what it really is. :)
[deleted] OP t1_iu1exd9 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] OP t1_iu1ewj7 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] OP t1_iu1euhn wrote
[removed]
ryschwith t1_iu13124 wrote
Well, I can tell you that a scalar field means that the field only has a field strength value at any given point; as opposed to a vector field which has a field strength value and a direction. Think about a magnetic field and you have some idea of what a vector field is.
I can also tell you that “spin” is a quantum property of particles. It’s like angular momentum but not exactly angular momentum. We don’t really understand what it is so we call it spin because that’s a close enough analogy to let us reason things out about it.
I don’t understand enough about quantum fields in general or the Higgs field in particular to tell you what the significance of it being a spin-0 scalar field would be.
Alarmed_Economics_90 t1_iu16ee2 wrote
So when I think "field" I imagine a large plane, probably with some sort of grid overlaid. More accurately, I think in my mind the "field" is the grid points themselves.. I can imagine it's n-dimensional as well just fine, of course.
So I just found this definition : "The word ‘field' signifies the variation of a quantity(whether scalar or vector) with position."
I think a spin-0 (spherical symmetry with no preferred axis) field, then, is scalar because if the uniformity of the higgs particles.
I know that's not explaining the significance but did that sound right at all so far?
[deleted] OP t1_iu1fexr wrote
[removed]
ryschwith t1_iu2a54z wrote
I don't think that's quite it, although I admit this is at the borders of my understanding of physics. Spin isn't a property of the field, it's a property of the particles generated by the field. It has nothing to do with the field being scalar or not.
[deleted] OP t1_iu1f2fv wrote
[removed]
[deleted] OP t1_iu1etcz wrote
[removed]
[deleted] OP t1_iu1erv9 wrote
[removed]
Chadmartigan t1_iu0zog9 wrote
Close but I think you've got it backwards. It's the field that imparts the property of mass to certain particles, specifically: quarks, leptons, and W and Z bosons. The other gauge bosons (photons and gluons) do not interact with Higgs, and are therefore massless.
However, I do not understand how one would release or extract energy from Higgs.
MarshyBarsh t1_iu10e9e wrote
~3:14 explains how the higgs field can release potential energy, causing false vacuum decay.
Chadmartigan t1_iu11h08 wrote
I know about vacuum decay but I'm not sure how you're supposed to harness vacuum decay energy when the whole universe is deleted.
[deleted] OP t1_iu1f64u wrote
[removed]
Alarmed_Economics_90 t1_iu12co5 wrote
So it appears that if the higgs field collapses it releases energy. Unfortunately according to that video it also deletes the universe so I'm not sure if we're going to be able to harness that anytime soon but we could work toward it... maybe have tiny little universe deletions that we could create and harness.. I don't know!
Turns out it's a good question!!
[deleted] OP t1_iu1f4cv wrote
[removed]
Alarmed_Economics_90 t1_iu11sf4 wrote
I did type it backwards. Should be "makes it so matter has mass."
[deleted] OP t1_iu1fcsl wrote
[removed]
[deleted] OP t1_iu1f3c5 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] OP t1_iu1eqkd wrote
[removed]
[deleted] OP t1_iu10768 wrote
[deleted]
space-ModTeam t1_iu1eb0t wrote
Hello u/MarshyBarsh, your submission "If the Higgs Field can release energy, can it be harnessed?" has been removed from r/space because:
- Such questions should be asked in the "All space questions" thread stickied at the top of the sub.
Please read the rules in the sidebar and check r/space for duplicate submissions before posting. If you have any questions about this removal please message the r/space moderators. Thank you.
[deleted] OP t1_iu1eo27 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] OP t1_iu1ep5q wrote
[removed]
Alarmed_Economics_90 t1_iu0qz9u wrote
I'm not sure it releases energy exactly... I think it's like an energy field that makes it so
mass has mattermatter has mass.