Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Itsworthoverdoing t1_j0iraa7 wrote

You're talking about quantum entanglement, not a quantum computer. You don't need a full computer to communicate, you just need the communication bit. We are still miles away from accomplishing anything like what you're talking about.

11

dcRoWdYh OP t1_j0it9j2 wrote

That's what I was asking, Thanks! I'm Still not 100% on the workings of the quantum world, obviously lol

−11

Itsworthoverdoing t1_j0ixsuh wrote

See what we needed to answer your question? You needed to ask a question, get it answered, notice you didn't ask the correct question, and then give a bit more information so someone could help you. Next time that happens try to be a bit nicer to the people in the chain because we all needed to come together to figure out what you were talking about :)

8

dcRoWdYh OP t1_j0iy03i wrote

Nicer? All i did was ask questions.

−7

HuntyDumpty t1_j0jgfrx wrote

You said he missed the point by miles, but you did not state the point as you clarified it to be in your initial response in this thread. They didn’t really miss the point, you really failed to provide the most crucial information in the text part of your post. Some would consider blaming him for a mistake that is really yours rude.

1

HuntyDumpty t1_j0jgieq wrote

You said he missed the point by miles, but you did not state the point as you clarified it to be in your initial response in this thread. They didn’t really miss the point, you really failed to provide the most crucial information in the text part of your post. Some would consider blaming him for a mistake that is really yours rude.

Edit: meant to respond to comment beginning with “nicer?”

1