Submitted by jeffsmith202 t3_10phzks in space
JazzRider t1_j6la045 wrote
If you can eliminate space junk, you can just as easily get rid of an enemy’s satellites.
For_All_Humanity t1_j6lm62l wrote
Multiple countries already have that capability. Of course, the proliferation of abilities to do it cheaply might be a concern, but really for the good of us all we need to have the means to quickly and cheaply remove debris from orbit. It is inevitable that something breaks or there’s an accident or there’s debris that needs to be moved before it collides with something important. Or perhaps in the aftermath of a war which may see certain satellites annihilated we’ll need to do cleanup efforts.
AlpineCorbett t1_j6lu1hc wrote
We shot a satellite with an F-16 once. Turns out that's easier than getting rid of space junk....
Actually probably made that whole situation worse tbh
theBYUIfriend t1_j6lwzc5 wrote
F-15 actually
It was in 1986 weapons system test
AlpineCorbett t1_j6lxnrs wrote
Yep you're right. My B
Also, BYU? Hi neighbor.
theBYUIfriend t1_j6noq8t wrote
Well I just went to college there. And it was actually BYU Idaho. I like to call myself a "recovering" BYUI grad haha.
fakewokesnowflake t1_j6lyqz6 wrote
The Solwind ASAT Test was the F-15 launched ASAT to low LEO.
It produced debris that orbited for nearly two decades.
BirdOfSteel t1_j6lwsln wrote
You might be thinking of the F-15 that fired the missile. The missile actually had target-seeking capability so really the F-15 was mostly just an expensive missile launcher.
AlpineCorbett t1_j6lxt4p wrote
You're right. An f-15 with our first ASM. Way back in the mid 80s.
Makes me wonder what kind of sophisticated ASM's we might have now. Or perhaps other anti satellite munitions.
Personally I'm hoping for big ass lasers, for obvious reasons.
BirdOfSteel t1_j6mt29l wrote
Can't get much more effective than a missile that does the aiming for you. Since missile tech has already had a lot of funding/testing over the years, the missiles become cheaper to manufacture/sell, meaning which means you can just throw more bombs at the problem for the same amount of money.
Could make a really big laser if we just divert a little bit of the military budget though...
RhesusFactor t1_j6op8xu wrote
If you are interested have a read of the csis space threat assessment. https://aerospace.csis.org/space-threat-assessment-2022/
And report on counterspace weapons https://www.csis.org/analysis/defense-against-dark-arts-space-protecting-space-systems-counterspace-weapons
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments