Comments
QVkW4vbXqaE t1_j5etwey wrote
May I ask how and what kind of gear did you use? Great picture!
backyardspace OP t1_j5eubha wrote
The telescope was a 12" Meade lx200 acf ota that I had mounted to a skywatcher eq6-r pro mount and a zwo asi224mc camera. I Also use a zwo adc in my image train. I then use autostakkert for stacking and registax for wavelet processing
gorilla_photos t1_j5ev25y wrote
How much does the whole setup cost?
backyardspace OP t1_j5evbqt wrote
My setup if you bought new would be around 6k but I've seen people get similar results with a used $400 dobsonian telescope. It just requires a lot more patience and a steady hand.
rtphokie t1_j5ezvlr wrote
The other is Jupiter’s very short rotational period. Take too long to get your images to stack and the red spot will smear
QVkW4vbXqaE t1_j5fedsv wrote
Thank you, your pictures are great
PandaEven3982 t1_j5fv0dn wrote
I'm guessing multiple exposure with interesting lenses, and then advanced composition tools?
[deleted] t1_j5fysoj wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5j2iji wrote
[removed]
backyardspace OP t1_j5etv6f wrote
The process is known as lucky imaging where a high frame rate video is taken to provide thousands of frames in a short period of time. There are a few reasons for this. One is atmospheric distortions. The atmosphere is a very dynamic fluid that can make it look like the planet is underwater. However there will be brief moments of clarity so the more frames the more of these moments that are captured. You then stack these frames on top of each other in order to get a clearer photo. Doing this will also improve the signal to noise ratio and will reduce the camera noise (grain).