Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

A40 t1_j6nlq86 wrote

Yeah.. no. Materials.. no. Physics.. no. Costs.. no.

Politics? Never.

5

cjameshuff t1_j6nn9ty wrote

Yeah, even ignoring the politics, Starship should be able to get launch cost <$200/kg, lower than just the energy costs for the space elevator in Edwards' study. You're not going to get launching something with a nuclear fission bomb and a massively hardened nuclear space gun to be lower than that, just due to the costs of the bomb itself, never the massive propellant costs and complications of snagging it from a suborbital trajectory with a Starship.

Just put the payload on a Starship.

2