Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Loose-Addition-5730 t1_j65oh0r wrote

Reply to comment by GSte2022 in Why are "metals" more effective at cooling molecular clouds than hydrogen and helium? by Thomas_Bonk

Your definition of metals is interesting.

4

swfo t1_j65p66f wrote

That is the definition of metals Astronomers use. I just learned it from Dr. Becky. It was shocking at first but makes sense from an astronomical point of view. Still, I will never be comfortable calling carbon or neon a metal.

10

Loose-Addition-5730 t1_j67m8ta wrote

Coming from a chemistry background this will take some getting used to.

2

TFK_001 t1_j6azo2j wrote

Our chemistry teacher would always bring up this definition in the first few weeks of class but it makes sense from an astronomical standpoint

1

DarthBrooks69420 t1_j66hwx1 wrote

Welcome to astonomy, where everything that isn't H/He is a metal and what is currently going on in a galaxy 50 million light years away doesn't matter.

5

dern_the_hermit t1_j662epi wrote

In astronomy, metallicity is the abundance of elements present in an object that are heavier than hydrogen and helium.

3

OffusMax t1_j68i0aq wrote

Chemically speaking, a metal is a substance whose outermost electrons are only loosely attracted to the nucleus and form an “electron sea” when in the solid state. Which is why metals are better conductors than non-metals.

2

dude_1818 t1_j67cvpp wrote

Basically, any element that formed later than the big bang is a metal

2