Submitted by Creepy_Toe2680 t3_10ozjk9 in space
Hampamatta t1_j6lthgq wrote
Reply to comment by a10t2 in NASA tested new propulsion tech that could unlock new deep space travel possibilities by Creepy_Toe2680
Theoretically ion engines are the pinnacle of propulsion. Far more efficient than normal combustion engines. And doesn't satellites already use small ion engines for realignment?
Earthfall10 t1_j6lv6wv wrote
Eh, there are other electric engine options that are better than ion engines, such as plasma engines or mass drivers. And if power isn't a limiting factor the ultimate in propellent efficiency is a photon rocket, aka a light bulb. No need to carry propellent, though you need 300 megawatts of photons to get a pathetic newton of thrust, so whatever reactor is powering it will need a shit ton of fuel. Though if you're using a laser array to push a mirrored sail that power plant can remain on the ground.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments