Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

mynextthroway t1_j32waeu wrote

Ok. I'm getting really tired of people reading part of my comment and comprehending less, so I will walk you through it. I said, " When I was growing up," which would imply 12-21. Old enough to be becoming aware of the world, but not an adult. I also said, "in the 70s and 80s," which covers 20 years, but we only need 10, so I grew up 78-88 or so. Which is exactly right.

This is the snow I saw. Most years showing well above average and one year showing double the average. It fits with my comment of "crushing snow"

This is the rain I saw. The beginning of my time frame marks the beginning of a significant increase in rainfall, a state wide increase that lasts years. Except I don't have the stats available to show that it is an increase, so this is California normal.

[This is the fire I saw](http://Long-term trends in wildfire damages in California https://emlab.ucsb.edu/sites/default/files/documents/wildfire-brief.pdf) My idea for California's fire scene also developed on a peak period. It dropped off in th 90s before climbing.

My interpretation of California being a snow bound, flooding, burnt to hell state is statistically backed up for the time frame relevant to me, as was stated in my comment. Looking at the data I posted, California is drying out, getting less snow, and burning more. The Central valley has sunk 28 feet due to ground water not being replenishec.replenished.

You are establishing a drying out, dying environment as the great normal. This is how environmental destruction spreads because too many people today ignore older people who talk about how different their childhood was. You believe their experience is the ideal normal.

−1

yg2522 t1_j33c8ho wrote

just fyi, your personal experience isn't even close to what the majority of californians experience. The majority of people have always lived in or around the LA or SF area and did not experence these crushing snows or flooding you are talking about. When I was growing up there, I remember only one hailstorm in the silicon valley. That was about as bad as you got in terms of cold weather for the majority of the people who live in California....

7

mynextthroway t1_j34b01e wrote

Reread my comments. Now read them again. This isn't my personal experience. It's what I saw on the news in the 80s. Look at the post. See the blue words? Those are links to data from the state of Caliirnia that support what I claimed to have seen on the news. See the link to the Sierra Nevada snowfall? See how low relative to average it is becoming? That snow pack is where LA gets a lot of water. LA might have nothing but pretty weather, but LA is getting thirsty.

−2

yg2522 t1_j34i36a wrote

So basically you claim doom and high water and wondered why anybody would want to go and live in California without actually experiencing anything yourself from the place you are criticising.... man have you ever even traveled out of your state?

5

mynextthroway t1_j34kc7a wrote

Yes, I have. Traveled out of the country as well. I would actually like to visit California. The state looks magnificent.

"So basically you claim " look at all my comments. Flood, snow, drought, and fire comments are backed by state of California data.

This is the second time I have pointed out to you that I included links to data supporting my opinion.

As I said in my original response and the response that triggered you, it is a childhood opinion, based on facts that I have posted links to.

If you read all of my comments, drought is where California is heading.

1

sillykinesis t1_j330en4 wrote

Sigh… okay, literal Boomer.

(If you’re older than me, you’re a Boomer.)

Ah. But now that you said ‘78, you’re younger than me. Jesus, man. You’re a terrible Gen Xer.

0