Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Fourney t1_j6jb93k wrote

This title is wrong by a factor of ten.* This asteroid came within 25,000 miles, not 2,000.

*It's not wrong. The article had another number I took at face value.

Edit: I stand corrected. Fascinating stuff! Thanks for the corrections.

3

rdhatt t1_j6kn5i2 wrote

The title is correct. The asteroid was imaged at ~13,000 miles.

Sources:Website of astronomer cited in Newsweek (warning ads):

https://www.virtualtelescope.eu/2023/01/27/near-earth-asteroid-2023-bu-extremely-close-encounter-image-video-and-podcast-26-jan-2023/

JPL:https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasa-system-predicts-small-asteroid-to-pass-close-by-earth-this-week

>Designated 2023 BU, the asteroid will zoom over the southern tip of South America at about 4:27 p.m. PST (7:27 p.m. EST) only 2,200 miles (3,600 kilometers) above the planet’s surface

edit: ~13,000 miles, not ~22,000. Newsweek is correct, confirmed from first link above

4

sonstone t1_j6jsa4c wrote

That makes more sense. I was reading this and thinking that was crazy close and how is this the first time I’m hearing about this.

2

Fourney t1_j6jsnk9 wrote

Yeah for real, a bit disappointed there were so many comments and not a single mention of the inaccuracy.

0

homeinscotland t1_j6koicf wrote

The video images were of 25,000 miles away but it came within 2,500 miles or so at its closest.

1