Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

astro_pettit OP t1_j3enwpx wrote

My first orbital star trail; taken during Expedition 6 in early 2003. I took this before we had low noise, nighttime-sensitive digital cameras. This photo was taken with a Nikon F5, 58mm noct-Nikkor f1.2 lens with Fujichrome ISO 800 film and a 65 second exposure. All the detail seen in my later digital star trails can be seen; atmospheric airglow appearing as a green key lime pie layer, the fainter upper atmospheric red f-region, cities streaking by from orbital motion, lightning storms flashing as a function of time, and star trails. The blips in the star trail arcs were caused by the ISS attitude shifting around due to a down mode failure of our control moment gyros. For high speed film, it would become fogged by cosmic rays after about a month and was typically flown only on short two week Space Shuttle missions.

I got special permission to fly this film, launching with us on STS 113 in November 2002 and was supposed to return on STS 114 in February. Due to the STS 107 Columbia disaster, STS 114 was delayed for 2½ years. I returned about 70 rolls of film on our Soyuz TMA-1 in May 2003. Working with the photochemistry engineers at NASA JSC, we developed one roll at a time to find the best development process that minimized the effects of cosmic ray damage. This photo is the result from that effort.

More star trails from space can be found on my Instagram and Twitter accounts.

629

TheVastReaches t1_j3er8im wrote

I can see the refraction in the trails, bending as they approach the horizon. That’s awesome. What an opportunity !

16

okhan3 t1_j3etsa5 wrote

This is cool as hell. Want to share to r/AnalogCommunity ?

5

Highspdfailure t1_j3etsh9 wrote

Follow his Instagram. These photos need to be seen by all.

7

FastWalkingShortGuy t1_j3eux8r wrote

It's hurting my brain seeing that thunderstorm lightning trail going a different direction than the star trails, and trying to think about how the space station is moving one direction while the earth rotates another direction.

22

davtheminer t1_j3ev1na wrote

What do you do now? If you don't mind me asking. Curious as I'm guessing you aren't still doing space flights

6

Zymoria t1_j3evat3 wrote

I'm sitting here going "Now how does one get a camera up that high and stabilized long enough for that exposure."

Then I'm like "NASA astronaut... that would do it."

105

Atheios569 t1_j3exeti wrote

It looks amazing! Does the ISS shake from time to time? I noticed there may have been a bump during the exposure. If so that’s fascinating as I never would have imagined the ISS shaking.

3

I-am-the-stigg t1_j3f8jfz wrote

I think what is the craziest thing about this picture is the fact that it was taken by 1 of about 10 (maybe less) possible people on reddit of the hundreds of millions of users that can have this type of experience. That's the cool part for me.

19

[deleted] t1_j3fng65 wrote

You are coolest guy I have ever seen on reddit, bar none.

11

lith1x t1_j3fo394 wrote

What causes the star trails? Is it the rotation of the ISS..?

2

0-KrAnTZ-0 t1_j3fymxa wrote

Deconvolute the psf from the white line and you'll get a sharp image

0

whiskysinger t1_j3fzhrd wrote

Yes - it is exactly the same mechanism as the star trails taken from Earth's surface. Except the ISS is orbiting much quicker than the Earth is rotating. This is why the trails in this photo are so long for such a short exposure*.

Interestingly, the celestial pole is different on the iss than what we are used to on earth (Polaris in the northern hemisphere) because the orbital axis is not the same as Earth's axis of rotation, as demonstrated in the gif below.

https://gfycat.com/meagerscientificbengaltiger

*The ISS takes 90 minutes to orbit the earth. This means it is completing one trip around its orbital axis 16 times per earth day. The photo took 65 seconds of exposure. To capture star trails of this length on earth would take 16 x 65 seconds = 1040 seconds = 17m20s of exposure. (I think! Please correct me if I'm wrong)

2

MD_Tarnished t1_j3g5fp9 wrote

How many astronauts are in space now? Seems like we can see space pictures quite often

2

Scholesie09 t1_j3ge92n wrote

It's not really to do with the rotation of the earth, the iss is moving across the face of the earth which moves the thunderstorm straight left, but it's also rotating as it orbits to keep the same side facing earth, so relative to the background stars it is rotating, getting the curved trails.

9

CoolAndyNeat t1_j3go369 wrote

It’s amazing how that much movement happened in only 65 seconds. Awesome photo!

3

FriedFreya t1_j3gx2mg wrote

This photo is so beautiful, I am literally teary typing this. Thank you so much for sharing.

2

Hector_Savage_ t1_j3gy7cg wrote

Oh s**t! Don Pettit himself is here on this sub! Didn’t know that. I watched many videos where you were interviewed, sir, you are a legend! And beautiful picture

5

MD_Tarnished t1_j3l336c wrote

Must be an insane accomplishment to go to space, considering the population on earth and only 10 people are there.. It's also pretty sad to think about our life span is not long enough to see the world progress

1

astro_pettit OP t1_j3orvlv wrote

Normally there are 4 control moment gyros to hold station attitude, there was a failure so we were down to three and the control algorithm for this down mode was still being tweaked so some blips were expected

3

PandaGoggles t1_j3os6ex wrote

That’s really cool. I bet the photo chem person enjoyed the challenge. When traveling with film I store it in a little shielded box. Usually TSA will check it by hand for me, but sometimes they’re really weird about it. Did you store your rolls in some sort of shielded box as well?

1