Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Sekhen t1_j4xu3ju wrote

Aren't there cameras on the ISS streaming live? Close enough.

Telescopes expose for hours, days even, before they have a picture. Not much to see there.

13

neorandomizer t1_j4y60pt wrote

Agree, Reddit should crowd fund one I’m sure SpaceX can give us a ride.

2

iqisoverrated t1_j4zf5fr wrote

What would be the point? Data collection and image processing takes a loooooooong time. Scientific telescopes aren't "tape a camera to one end and take a snapshot".

5

mustafar0111 t1_j52eahn wrote

They have better uses for telescopes in space like research.

If you really wanted to do that place a dozen or so telescopes around the world and have them live feed their auto-stretch target data to a website.

2

mustafar0111 t1_j52ehlj wrote

You can see them live but there is a delay.

You can run 300s exposure in NINA and it will auto-stretch it as soon as its complete. It sort of feeds as a slideshow.

It won't look as good as a fully stacked and processed image but you still can get a good look at a lot of the targets out there. Especially anything lower magnitude.

2

mustafar0111 t1_j52frjm wrote

Science. Astrophysicists can use the telescopes to learn how the universe actually works and refine theories. Telescopes are expensive and complicated to put in space and they can make better use of those then we can.

For just public interest telescopes on earth will do just fine if you setup the right equipment. Some of the newer automated one can do the entire process from image acquisition to stacking and auto post-processing live.

2