Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

drdrillaz t1_jbj4sde wrote

As much as Tiger is worth the nda should have included some form of payment to ensure it’s enforced after a break up. A couple million for her silence is nothing to a billionaire

0

twochain2 t1_jbji878 wrote

You don’t need money tied to an NDA to enforce it, that’s the whole point of the NDA.

9

drdrillaz t1_jbjj2bm wrote

I know you don’t need to, but it’s wise to ensure the person doesn’t try to contest it. You tie the payment to acceptance of terms and forfeit the money if they don’t accept and try to fight it

−4

NevermoreTheSF t1_jbjttr1 wrote

it's not a marriage, is it expected to pay off every person you date?

2

drdrillaz t1_jbjuqte wrote

When you’re a billionaire celebrity and you lived with someone for 6 years who knows everything about you it’s not only expected but foolish not to. You don’t need headaches. This is a headache now. Could have all been avoided for a $2M likely. You gave Rachel Uchitel and a bunch of other skanks a lot more to protect your image

−7