Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

mrwaltwhiteguy t1_jdz9aip wrote

A simple cheek swab will settle it.

If he’s not her father, then we know that. If he is…. Well, don’t be a dickhead and have your lawyers settle or some such, and be done with it.

No one needed to know a single thing about this if Jerry had just done right by her in the first place and not been a giant piece of shit about it.

35

brett1081 t1_jdzg9y2 wrote

I mean I love someone not motivated by money that continuously sues for, you know, money.

12

Pktur3 t1_jdzja5c wrote

Idk, if he is her father and had been intentionally neglectful in raising her, why wouldn’t she be entitled to restitution? I mean plenty of deadbeats out there are sitting in jail over the lack of support, it shouldn’t be different here.

23

Kidnovatex t1_jdzrrnl wrote

He's already admitted to being the father and has paid millions to her mother based on an agreement they signed years ago. You could call him a "deadbeat" for not wanting to be involved in her life, I suppose, but he's paid out plenty of money to give her a very good quality of living over the years.

16

[deleted] t1_jdzsz2d wrote

[deleted]

−4

Kidnovatex t1_jdzti4h wrote

Small installments? No, I'm saying that the woman was a consenting party when she chose to have sex with a married man, so there's fault on both sides. She also was a consenting party when she signed an NDA which included millions of dollars in payments from Jerry jones over the course of her daughter's childhood and college years. Does that make Jerry Jones a saint? No, obviously not, but it's not much different than if they had gotten divorced and she was given custody. He paid his child support payments.

9

jorge1209 t1_je1lpbz wrote

The agreement Jones had with the mother is with the mother. It excuses Jones from any legal and moral obligation he has to her as a co-parent. It does not satisfies his moral obligations as the father to the child.

As a society we tend not to recognize that children have any kind of legal right to parental affection, but its pretty clear that Jones has opted not to fulfill that moral duty. He has given what amounts to pocket change to this girls mother, but no amount of money can substitute for not having a father.

Legally the woman cannot demand anything on the basis of that, but morally I'm all for her taking Jones for a ride. Fuck the guy. When you bastardize your own children, you are the bastard.

−4

dirtybird131 t1_je0nrx7 wrote

My guy, he's BEEN paying, did you even read the article? This bitch just decided he wasn't paying enough, despite a free ride thru college and a brand new Range Rover on her 16th Bday.

But honestly, it's probably less about the money and more about what being Jerry Jones' daughter could do for her political career

8

jorge1209 t1_je14r31 wrote

"the bitch" decided that the pocket change of a billionaire was not sufficient to offset the moral obligation to fulfill ones parental obligations.

I tend to agree with her. If Jerry Jones wants to make bastards of his children, then I'm all for those children taking every penny they can from him.

1

LightningVole t1_je2pktc wrote

What makes her a bitch? She’s suing for defamation, because they’d lied about her, and to free herself from a contract that she never signed. Why should she be bound by a contract she never agreed to?

−3