Submitted by Willing-Sprinkles-17 t3_11lg43c in springfieldMO
BataMahn3 t1_jbh2082 wrote
Reply to comment by Mysteroo in Yes, this is a real debate that happened in Missouri’s State House yesterday. by Willing-Sprinkles-17
Are you saying there's never been a gay person who's married the opposite sex? Or were they straight when they married their wife and now they're gay? And if that's the case, were they born gay? And if so, how would marrying a woman suddenly make the gay man straight? Or were you assuming someone was straight simply because they're married to the opposite sex? Do you know that marriage has nothing to do with sexual orientation?
Mysteroo t1_jbhr1d4 wrote
Just to clarify... Are you siding with Ann Kelley on this?
If you think he's wrong for referencing Martha Washington because "marriage has nothing to do with sexual orientation," then I gotta say- you have a very unpopular opinion. Like - I GUESS it technically doesn't have to reflect your orientation, but the VAST majority of people would prefer to be married to someone that they are sexually attracted to.
There is a reason why people all throughout history would frequently try to hide their homosexuality by getting heterosexual marriages - BECAUSE PEOPLE LIKE TO MARRY THE PEOPLE THEY WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH.
If it had nothing to do with sexual orientation, then it wouldn't be a very effective way of pretending your not gay, would it?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments