Submitted by [deleted] t3_xzntdb in springfieldMO
Glam-Breakfast t1_irnc9qa wrote
Why do people care about this place. Somebody please give me a tweet length explanation because it seems very forced and stupid
20JPorter t1_iro3al3 wrote
It breaks up the monotony of road trips and thus is remembered fondly. Instead of a boring gas station where you just go in to grab a drink, it turns it into a destination and an experience that sells camping equipment, merchandise of the mascot, hot food options, a miniature section of random home goods. They say it's about the journey and not the destination, but in long road trips, the only part of the journey where anything happens is Buc-ees. And thus you get brand loyalty after a single visit and next thing you know you're wearing a Buc-ee hat everywhere and going 30 minutes out of the way just to stop there.
Also actually clean restrooms.
[deleted] OP t1_iros5cd wrote
[deleted]
Mule_Skinner_43 t1_iron76q wrote
Wages aren't actually that great - higher than a lot in town but still below a living wage. Not on bus routes so won't help low income workers. Some city benefit where we're taxed to give Buc-ee's a loan they pay back over like 20 years. Changes poor people's neighborhood in ways they don't have a say in.
VaderTower t1_irp56l1 wrote
We don't get taxed. Tax deferred for a set period of time (example 10 years of not having to pay property tax or sales tax, or whatever the deal is, which helps to pay back back the investment the business makes in the infrastructure, so that we the tax payers don't have to pay for a private companies build out).
Tax deferral is such a win-win. Sure we don't get as much in taxes for a business for 5 or 10 years. But by shooting it down we get zero. At least now in 5-10 years we get money. BUT that's also discounting the amount of travelers that will now stop and spend money in our city that might not have before.
It's a win win with no true arguable downside. Unless you just hate more people, in which case, go move to the sticks.
WendyArmbuster t1_irrdtyk wrote
If this place is going in where I think it is, the exit there was just re-worked to make the entrance and exit ramps longer, which will probably be required if it's going to get as much traffic as everybody says it will. Are you saying Buc-ee's is paying for that? If so, I would totally support a reduction in their taxes for a limited amount of time to offset exactly that amount of cost.
Overall though, using tax benefits to attract businesses is a losing situation for communities. It's a race to the bottom for communities, but it's a game you currently have to play or otherwise your town will lose to other towns who are willing to forego services and revenue. I support a federal 100% tax rate on all state and local tax deals used to attract business. It would make towns compete on other metrics for attracting businesses, such as quality of workforce, quality of life, and other things that would actually make towns better.
VaderTower t1_irydks8 wrote
No Bucees isn't paying for MODOT on/off ramps. Bucees was announced and debated earlier this year. The on/off ramps and MODOT approval would have taken at least 2 years to plan, and execute.
So I can confidently say any work MODOT is doing is 100% unrelated to Bucees.
Tax deferral might or might not. The thing is, without tax deferral, we wouldn't get Bucees. Strafford might, Joplin might, etc. By giving a tax deferral we don't lose any money, so I fail to see the downside for the city.
WendyArmbuster t1_iryzk44 wrote
If everybody is attracting business by giving tax deferrals, then we are all losing that money.
VaderTower t1_irzsgrk wrote
If we could all act with a collective mindset you would have solved game theory.
You're not wrong, but the dynamics are more complicated, and we have to act as rational actors as we expect others to.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments