Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

banjomin t1_itqhplq wrote

Reply to comment by deborah_jai in Vote NO on Question #1 by [deleted]

Developers: want to make money

You: how is that greedy???

Home owners: we don’t want the park ruined by a bunch of apartment buildings

You: this is greed.

2

ShartsvilleDestroyer t1_itqkwju wrote

How is the park ruined by an apartment building? Are they building the apartments in the park? The park will be busier. Is that what you mean by ruined? Cause that's not ruined.

0

banjomin t1_itqrndb wrote

Nah not what I meant. I like the trees around the park more than I would like a bunch of apartment buildings.

5

the_honeyman t1_itqijnk wrote

How would the park be ruined by building apartments down across the street?

−1

Low_Tourist t1_itqiwcl wrote

It's not down the street. It's directly across the street from the park.

8

the_honeyman t1_itqj9yj wrote

Ok. How would the park be ruined by building apartments across the street from the park?

1

banjomin t1_itqse1p wrote

Because right now there are a bunch of trees around there and that is nicer for the people at the park than a bunch of apartment buildings.

I personally would like to still have some sunshine there after 3pm instead of just being in the shade of an apartment building.

4

Comprehensive_Ad6049 t1_itqxcuu wrote

It will be ruined because the apartments will use the park as their retention pond.

4

the_honeyman t1_itqy8m0 wrote

The developer has no plans for dealing with runoff? That's a legitimate argument, though it seems like a failure on the planning and zoning commission to make them address it if true.

2