Always_0421 t1_j43nkp9 wrote
Reply to comment by kentfrostphoto in Pit Bull Owner Issued Citations in Willard Playground Attack: 'I know the dogs have to go' by Realistic-Sun3480
That and keeping them as pets.
OmniFella t1_j43pu9z wrote
If you're gonna have dogs like that, they need to be trained. You don't keep animals with raw instincts like that without training them to self-regulate. 20 bucks says they were completely untrained and considered their "territory" to be wherever the hell they were at any given moment unless calmed by their owner. Without the owner, anyone in view of those dogs were incorrectly considered "trespassers" by them. She's not a dumb bitch for having them. She's a dumb bitch for not training them. They're about half a step away from being ferral dogs at that point.
Funky_Farkleface t1_j44mn8j wrote
“Raw instincts” to do what? There are humans with raw instincts to harm others and we keep them locked up or we execute them. Do you believe serial killers with raw instincts are salvageable with training? Can a murderer coexist with us if we castrate, vaccinate, license, and train them? I believe some could be, a small percentage might be allowed into society with rigorous, highly-focused mental treatment. But there are, without debate, a percentage of those with “raw instincts” who will never qualify to share our space. That is the reality for humans with “raw instincts”.
Why is a dog, a single particular breed with the same raw instincts—murder—given more concession?
OmniFella t1_j460763 wrote
I'm talking about dogs. Not people. False equivalence. Your comparisons are bogus.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments