SinjiOnO t1_j6v87ww wrote
> Apprentice Bard
Sounds like a new Hearthstone mage card.
Jokes aside, this is a good development, competition benefits the consumer after all.
[deleted] t1_j6voqz8 wrote
[deleted]
bizarre_coincidence t1_j6w9qyl wrote
There is also the issue of accuracy. When they are trying to give you a webpage, the page may or may not be relevant or accurate, but it is someone else’s content. There isn’t any responsibility on their part to be correct. But if they are generating the answers, suddenly they are responsible for their validity. They might avoid legal culpability (maybe), but enough bad stories of people relying on the bot, not double checking the info, and getting screwed could tarnish google’s reputation. If chatGPT weren’t being used as a toy, being dismissed as “just a language model” whenever it generates harmful bullshit they is blatantly false, it could do a ton of harm. If google had a chat bot used in any official capacity, people would either take it much more seriously or they would have to essentially ignore it.
People rely on google,their AI assistant has to be much more accurate than chatGPT for it not to jeopardize that.
[deleted] t1_j6w9snm wrote
[deleted]
throwaway_ghast t1_j6vhly7 wrote
I'll never trust any advice from a spoony bard!
Karmadilla t1_j6vyzxd wrote
Sounds like they consulted Microsoft on the naming part.
1II1I1I1I1I1I111I1I1 t1_j6yw94o wrote
Might be an internal name
OK_Compooper t1_j6v9whc wrote
Or a very cheap or very expensive cologne.
[deleted] t1_j6zkoyw wrote
[deleted]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments