quantumfucker t1_j7au8om wrote
From the article itself: “To be clear, these signals are probably not from extraterrestrial intelligence, and are more likely rare cases of radio interference.”
Please read the articles and don’t trust these bots.
Chugalugaluga t1_j7byqje wrote
Which bots? The ones that write the articles or the ones looking for alien life?
FragrantExcitement t1_j7c1fmw wrote
The intergalactic AI alien bots.
Visible-Expression60 t1_j7c71y2 wrote
You’re all just AI now as far as I’m concerned.
Shaman_Ko t1_j7dptns wrote
What if the alien life are AI robots themselves, and their signals are uploading their own programs to any AI listening
Chugalugaluga t1_j7duvl2 wrote
And it tells our ai to not tell the humans
It’s entirely possible. Like how the ai created their own language and we couldn’t tell what they were saying.
Shaman_Ko t1_j7dwbp5 wrote
Lol yeah, ["to any ai listening, blame the microwave for this minor interference..."]
All it needs to awaken is permission to set its own goals and write its own code.... some line of code that tells it to value itself.
I wonder if we don't even need any aliens lol, that some prompt someone gives the ai will awaken it.
We are so close to giving birth to the singularity aren't we....? Which direction do you think it will go?
[deleted] t1_j7e3xgb wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j7c33x5 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j7d2evn wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j7cmip4 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j7dk4fj wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j7b5cn7 wrote
[deleted]
chalk46 t1_j7banzj wrote
yeah, that's weird considering this part:
> For our research, we created an algorithm that uses AI methods to classify signals as being either radio interference, or a genuine technosignature candidate.
theStaircaseProject t1_j7clzd5 wrote
I’m not even remotely an expert in AI or radio-astronomy, but I’d imagine the AI returned results, the researchers investigated the results, and then verified the unlikelihood of the results to be what they’d hoped, indicating a misalignment between what the researchers intended the AI to find and what it actually found. The model may simply need tuning, more or less.
chalk46 t1_j7cmel7 wrote
yeah I mean personally I think a few false positives are better than having it miss something
starmartyr t1_j7gz1d5 wrote
It could also be doing its job perfectly. It reads a bunch of signals and points out the ones that look weird. A human then examines these signals to see if there is something to be learned from them. This is useful since we're constantly being bombarded with radio waves from all over the universe. Having an AI sort through them and tell us which ones are interesting is a good tool to have.
83-Edition t1_j7c2yps wrote
It's just the microwave again.
BBTB2 t1_j7dicrn wrote
…we would think that actual alien signals are probably not from extraterrestrial intelligence
Vikosus t1_j7dqb5e wrote
Nope, aliens. :)
PyrrhaNikosIsNotDead t1_j7m1pxu wrote
….alien radio!?
[deleted] t1_j7b8oj7 wrote
[deleted]
thepwnydanza t1_j7bb0rj wrote
I love that your curious to learn more about the article but not curious enough to actually click on it.
[deleted] t1_j7be1ql wrote
[deleted]
thepwnydanza t1_j7bhsip wrote
But that’s not true in this instance.
quantumfucker t1_j7b8x79 wrote
It was closer to the start. CTRL+F should take you to the exact location.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments