strugglz t1_j80w1rx wrote
Spending money on vaporware that results in elections being less secure. Of course.
tundey_1 t1_j81a1on wrote
>that results in elections being less secure.
That's their goal. Just like when they say "government doesn't work; elect me and I'll prove it to you".
Captain-Griffen t1_j8276br wrote
The goal is to secure elections - for the Republicans.
Car-Altruistic t1_j84xro9 wrote
Vaporware? The technology has existed for literally all of my career and I’m old, they’re actually mandated for things that are a lot less consequential than voting systems. The fact voting machine manufacturers don’t want to use such technology is a bigger problem.
I could literally make a RPi based device that plugs into existing voting machines today and sell you a solution that anyone can track online in less than 4 hours, secure, cryptographic proof that track records of votes as they come in.
As the article says, they can always go back to paper, which has been proposed on every side (D, R and I) when alleging fraud.
_Oman t1_j85s4rj wrote
You didn't read the requirements very well. You only have a partial solution. They specified the impossible.
LurkerNoLonger_ t1_j85wdy8 wrote
You didn’t even read the article you brainwashed child.
You have no clue how stupid you look because you couldn’t do the bare minimum before commenting.
Sad.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments