tricksterloki t1_j9x5bjb wrote
Reply to comment by fastornator in US says Google routinely destroyed evidence and lied about use of auto-delete by OutlandishnessOk2452
Some laws define necessary record keeping for certain tasks, such as tax info. If you have been instructed to preserve documents of a given type for a given legal case, you preserve that until after discovery at the very least. You might want to preserve it longer for your own legal purposes in that case. People can also be interviewed or subpoenad. It's not about storing it indefinitely. It's about being legally instructed to store it, saying you are, and then not storing it. Google specifically said it suspended auto-deletion but didn't. Google lying is the important part.
daveime t1_j9xnvaj wrote
> If you have been instructed to preserve documents of a given type for a given legal case
However, in this case the "given type" was "everything". But totally not overreach.
fastornator t1_j9xq1dw wrote
I assume you mean a /s
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments