Submitted by ActivePersona t3_11b6wx9 in technology
uwu2420 t1_j9y8y3c wrote
Reply to comment by drawkbox in Signal CEO: We “1,000% won’t participate” in UK law to weaken encryption by ActivePersona
> Same with getting access to your iCloud/Apple account
No you don’t, because it is stored unencrypted on Apple servers and Apple themselves will give it to you (for example, with a legal request). If you go this route, you don’t need the physical device or any of the user’s passwords. The user won’t even know it’s happened until they are told.
The difference is in one case, my password and my physical device is needed. If you want that, you’ll have to physically get my device from me, and then get me to tell you my passcode. The other is just stored on Apple’s servers. If you don’t see how one is much harder than the other, I dunno what to tell you lol
Edit: no need to believe me, believe American law enforcement instead and refer to the leaked slide I posted earlier.
drawkbox t1_j9y9geb wrote
Unencrypted behind being encrypted by the user context... so yes, not double encrypted. You can encrypt it though.
Messaging apps also get cam/mic/location/contacts permissions, Signal is no different, one more entity with your face/voice/place/friends.
We definitely agreed to disagree.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments