Submitted by Wagamaga t3_11e576o in technology
SquatchWithNoHeroes t1_jaesgu9 wrote
Reply to comment by SILENTSAM69 in Britain breaks 'green grid' record with latest 100 per cent clean power milestone by Wagamaga
Yes and no.
Depending on enviroment
Swamp, boggy terrains trap large amounts of CO2. On the other hand, the anaerobic decomposition that often occurs in such enviroments can emit large amounts of methane.
And expanding forests creates a net loss, while cutting them down obviously emits CO2.
All in all, forest can't be simply be grown magically, not all areas are suitable for forests. And I don't see many countries capable of embarking into antidesertification campaigns like China succesfuly.
SILENTSAM69 t1_jaex3to wrote
Yeah very true. At least methane is less of a concern considering its cycle is so short lived compared to CO2 taking thousands of years to pull out of the system. I see some getting confused that methane traps more heat, but scientists are less concerned about it. The life cycle of the gas in the atmosphere being a big part of the problem.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments