Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Stryker1-1 t1_jec44js wrote

Should be halted allowing the competition time to bring their AI to market.

49

WoolyLawnsChi t1_jecdh93 wrote

Open AIs competition wants Open AI to stop crushing them

what a surprise

EDIT: of course, there are very serious issues to discuss around AI

but these yahoos pissed away fortunes on crypto, Web 3.0, NFTs, and the Meta-Verse and are now blindsided by AI

they want a “pause” so they can catch up

39

_JellyFox_ t1_jecdl6i wrote

Ah, open letter didn't work so billionaires ran to the regulators and paid them off.

59

malelder t1_jecfvca wrote

To me, these are finally the "smart agents" we were promised back in the day. We're nowhere near AI :/

Source: some dude

4

McFatty7 t1_jecg97l wrote

Not gonna happen.

Our free market works both ways.

Now that there's something that threatens them, they want to shut down competition.

Nope.

5

Redchong t1_jecgopt wrote

It’s a free market baby. Shut up and move on, losers

15

albeva t1_jecmtt3 wrote

First order should be to investigate who funds them and who stands to gain. I bet it has nothing to do with "security" or "safety". It's all about money and those missing out on the AI race.

10

blueSGL t1_jed7gnq wrote

How has this narrative sprung up so quickly and spread so widely.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Letter_on_Artificial_Intelligence

https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/ai-open-letter/

Back in 2015 the same org drafted an open letter and announced potential issues with AI's and that was years before any sort of commercialization effort.

There are alignment researchers who have signed the letter, both times.

Current models cannot be controlled or explained in fine grain enough detail to control (the problem is being worked on by people like Neel Nanda and Chris Olah but it's still very early stages and they need more time and people working on the problem)

The current 'safety' measures are bashing at a near infinite whack-a-mole board whenever it outputs something deemed wrong and it is far from 'safe'

21

AmateurBusinessGoose t1_jedfok8 wrote

Idk why you all are cheering AI on.

If the suits can replace us with an AI they will.

I for one AM NOT OKAY with that idea.

2

DeeplyTroubledSmurf t1_jedkmpe wrote

I would like to go on public record as fully supporting the idea of giving AI unfettered access to the internet with the ability to execute self-written code. There is definitely no chance that it could evolve in unpredictable ways at speeds we can't comprehend!

11

WagiesRagie t1_jedoqen wrote

Billionaires hiring Redditors even.

Give it up old men. We will never do homework again. We will cease to even name our own children. The time of synthetics has dawned and you will be assimilated.
You will eat the bugs crafted by expert AI chefs.

−2

seweso t1_jedruny wrote

People on here are all completely distracted by Elon, as if all this is a ploy of some kind. Yet almost nobody read the underlying papers about (for instance) the power-seeking behaviour raw GPT-4 showed.

2

nemesit t1_jedt5dz wrote

The only thing that should be addressed is that openai is still called openai

3

ss_221 t1_jedu2t4 wrote

More like openai is going to follow the same path as crypto, web 3.0, nfts, metaverse no matter what the competitors/billionaires or everyone else does. As problem complexity grows, the only thing that becomes obvious is everyone is full of shit.

−5

[deleted] t1_jedxgxb wrote

Bro you're about to become obsolete in that free market I just hope you realize that.

If you think you had a hard enough time convincing a company you were worth 150k before you're definitely not worth it now LOL

−3

aaaanoon t1_jee33hu wrote

Had my first bash at it today. Gotta say, mightily unimpressive.

−2

memberjan6 t1_jee4l8c wrote

No, it asked for the NLP models that are successors to gpt4 to be paused. Not all AI, not gpt4.

1

Im_bad_at_commenting t1_jee80gr wrote

They sound like NOKIA in 2008. Clueless and stuck in their own little world while iPhone was starting to crush them.

6

UNSECURE_ACCOUNT t1_jeee7bv wrote

I've never been worth anything more than 64K. I'm sure it'll suck for you software engineers but ... meh. You didn't care that I wasn't making what you were making. Why should I care now that you'll make less too?

2

Ambitious_Risk_9460 t1_jeelopo wrote

You can’t stop the technology, only drive it elsewhere. Could be a different country, could be black market….

1

sometimes-wondering t1_jeen71z wrote

Werent billionaires just crying about the birthrate declines and how they will be low in meat for the grinder? Now AI is a problem because it will cut jobs and create unemployment??

I think theres some butthurt piss babies throwing a tantrum because their AI isnt ready

2

AltCtrlShifty t1_jeezw79 wrote

Too much power in the hands of civilians? Gotta restrict it to the corporations.

1