ramtax666 t1_je6nbb0 wrote
Many such designs have a huge flaw: the fuel. We don't have a good way of producing hidrogen without high energy demand and it requires very low temperature for any significant amount to be stored. Basic 30-40% if the energy potential is wasted for production and storage. So it is a huge pain to work with it, this being the reason why it doesn't catch as a car fuel, it is to expensive just to have it and potentially dangerous. Now taking all of this in consideration and putting the system in a supersonic device that can suffer 10% thermic delation dosen't sounds a good idea, but who knows history favours the bold
BungOnMimosas t1_je730xe wrote
That’s why the Starship from SpaceX is such a great design, it uses Methane as it’s fuel
ramtax666 t1_je757uq wrote
More or less, I'm not so hyped about the vertical landing, especially for a design that will carry people and without an ejection system. But they got the safest fuel available that is for sure, still needs cryogenic for the oxygen but is safer.
do_you_even_ship_bro t1_je8t6by wrote
Starship has never flown…
BungOnMimosas t1_je8ya5g wrote
I mean it takes a long time to make a rocket, but starship is developing rather rapidly and should see its first orbital launch within the next two months
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments