Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ramtax666 t1_je6nbb0 wrote

Many such designs have a huge flaw: the fuel. We don't have a good way of producing hidrogen without high energy demand and it requires very low temperature for any significant amount to be stored. Basic 30-40% if the energy potential is wasted for production and storage. So it is a huge pain to work with it, this being the reason why it doesn't catch as a car fuel, it is to expensive just to have it and potentially dangerous. Now taking all of this in consideration and putting the system in a supersonic device that can suffer 10% thermic delation dosen't sounds a good idea, but who knows history favours the bold

10

BungOnMimosas t1_je730xe wrote

That’s why the Starship from SpaceX is such a great design, it uses Methane as it’s fuel

1

ramtax666 t1_je757uq wrote

More or less, I'm not so hyped about the vertical landing, especially for a design that will carry people and without an ejection system. But they got the safest fuel available that is for sure, still needs cryogenic for the oxygen but is safer.

4

do_you_even_ship_bro t1_je8t6by wrote

Starship has never flown…

1

BungOnMimosas t1_je8ya5g wrote

I mean it takes a long time to make a rocket, but starship is developing rather rapidly and should see its first orbital launch within the next two months

2