bak2redit t1_itf83ls wrote
Reply to comment by Crack_uv_N0on in Meta threatens to block news content in Canada over media revenue-sharing legislation by BollocksAsBalls
Ok m confused about these laws, is Facebook needing to pay for links to news outlets posted by it's users?
Doesn't that already financially benefit the news outlets due to their own ads being seen when someone clicks the link? Isn't this like double dipping?
Crack_uv_N0on t1_itfhvtw wrote
The referenced Australia law, which the Canadian law mimics,requires paying the news sources a fee. What FB, Google, et al are doing contributes to a loss of revenue from advertisers. Having to click on a link, which is voluntary, is not the same as having ads staring the readers in the face. If it was, you would not be seeing sources requiring a subscription, some trying to entice with a limited number of freebies, others to read even one. Printed editions have demonstrably thinner because of this revenue loss. In the meantime, FB, Google, etc. are benefitting from others’ labors without compensating. This did not begin with FB and Google..They have made it worse.
bak2redit t1_itgdbst wrote
Maybe instead making laws to protect depreciating industries, those industries should be forced to evolve their business models.
Policy like this slow down progress.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments