Submitted by diacewrb t3_z7rfq8 in technology
[deleted] t1_iy8hpuc wrote
This is slippery slope . I can see government shutting down valid criticism by using “sexism or racism” card.
bastiroid t1_iy8ql5p wrote
Already happening, the amount of valid criticism of Liz truss that was written of to sexism was stagering imho
onyxengine t1_iy9w1o8 wrote
To be fair, how much valid criticism of feminism gets mixed in with foaming at the mouth misogyny on the internet. I can’t remember the last time I read a valid critique of feminism, and toxic femininity that didn’t end up next to way past the line of decency red-pill takes. The internet is a confusing mess.
DetectiveTank t1_iy9fo3r wrote
They already do. Exhibit A: the Canadian Liberal Party.
yem_slave t1_iyastb9 wrote
I was told that opposing a downtown baseball stadium was racist. So yeah we've already slid down that slope
[deleted] t1_iybfywd wrote
[removed]
hblok t1_iybyy98 wrote
You think?
Pretty much everything anybody says which somebody else does not agree with is "racist". Unless it relates to a woman, in which case it's "sexist". And obviously it's illegal to make claims such as "men cannot bear children".
Now, the mindbogglingly thing here is not that governments wants to censor. That's what they do. Rather, it's that the woke cancel culture still has so broad support that politicians push through with it. In a free society, it ought to be political suicide to even as much as propose a law like this. Yet here we are, with more and more censorship and cancel laws.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments